jump to navigation

Webscrubbing in Wikileaks Libel Row November 13, 2008

Posted by Joanne KY Teoh in News.
Tags: , ,
trackback

Here’s an interesting read about a spat in Index on Censorship, Britain’s leading organisation promoting freedom of expression.

The New Statesman has removed a blog post caught between threats from an Iraqi billionaire and Web whistleblower site, Wikileaks. The site says the move would defame Wikileaks by implying its content was inaccurate. Wikileaks also claims news organisations were pressured to remove the offending articles.

Wikinews has confirmed that at least some of the articles involved definitely previously existed but have now been removed, including from newspapers that usually keep all of their articles online.

So does it mean that if a certain book contains inaccuracies, and a reviewer gave the book a good review, the publisher can now sue on the grounds that the reviewer has “defamed their professionalism” by offering a contrary opinion? Or if someone writes inaccuracies about another person (whether libellous or not), will this person risk being sued simply for daring to put the record straight publicly?

Related read:
Eight stories on Obama linked billionaire Nadhmi Auchi censored from the Guardian, Observer, Telegraph and New Statesman

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: